# Cartesi Lambada - a "worse is better" initiative

**URL:** <https://governance.cartesi.io/t/cartesi-lambada-a-worse-is-better-initiative/328>\
**Category:** Technical Evolution Plan\
**Created:** [January 4, 2024, 7:46am UTC](https://governance.cartesi.io/t/cartesi-lambada-a-worse-is-better-initiative/328 "2024-01-04T07:46:09Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 18

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![carsten.munk](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/3bc359/32.png) [@carsten.munk](https://governance.cartesi.io/u/carsten.munk)\
**Post date:** [January 5, 2024, 1:31pm UTC](https://governance.cartesi.io/t/cartesi-lambada-a-worse-is-better-initiative/328/18 "2024-01-05T13:31:39Z")

</div>

> All in all, do you see Rollups and Lambada converging

I see everything converging over 12 months into a Cartesi Computer, or Cartesi protocol, or whichever.

General idea: by all means let’s get different ways of getting inputs in these lambda functions. There’s no reason why we couldn’t have a EVM based sequencer smart contract we take inputs from, already today.

---

_[View the full topic](https://governance.cartesi.io/t/cartesi-lambada-a-worse-is-better-initiative/328)._