# Cartesi Lambada - a "worse is better" initiative

**URL:** <https://governance.cartesi.io/t/cartesi-lambada-a-worse-is-better-initiative/328>\
**Category:** Technical Evolution Plan\
**Created:** [January 4, 2024, 7:46am UTC](https://governance.cartesi.io/t/cartesi-lambada-a-worse-is-better-initiative/328 "2024-01-04T07:46:09Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 14

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![milton-cartesi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/9f8e36/32.png) [@milton-cartesi](https://governance.cartesi.io/u/milton-cartesi)\
**Post date:** [January 5, 2024, 12:39pm UTC](https://governance.cartesi.io/t/cartesi-lambada-a-worse-is-better-initiative/328/14 "2024-01-05T12:39:56Z")

</div>

I like the idea of posting the app state to IPFS! This obviously only makes sense with Lambda (or Lambada), when the state is separate from the app, and if done well I think clients will be able to download only part of the state too (e.g., a directory within the state).  
Btw, have you been talking to @Diego about [Lambda](https://governance.cartesi.io/t/stateless-execution-lambda/302), or how we can converge efforts here? I didn’t see any comments of yours there.  
.

---

_[View the full topic](https://governance.cartesi.io/t/cartesi-lambada-a-worse-is-better-initiative/328)._